Workshop on Item Analiysis for Teacher of State Vocational High School 6 in Jambi City

Authors

  • Arpizal Arpizal Universitas Jambi
  • Suratno Suratno Universitas Jambi
  • Muhammad Arif Liputo Universitas Jambi
  • Refnida Refnida Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31258/cers.3.6.271-279

Keywords:

workshop, questions, economics

Abstract

To determine the success of the education program, high-quality test instruments are necessary, namely those that are valid, reliable, have a sufficiently good level of difficulty, and can differentiate between the learning outcomes of proficient and non-proficient students. Ideally, these questions should be prepared by economics teachers. In reality, however, many teachers generally do not know how to prepare good questions. This is closely related to teachers' activities, which have been primarily focused on meeting learning targets alone. This is the source of the problem because teachers are rarely given the opportunity to prepare high-quality questions. To address this issue, this Professional Development Program (PPM) is implemented. The main target of the activity is teachers from Vocational High School 6 in Jambi City, with a total of 20 participants. The expected outcome of the training is that participants can compose questions that meet quality standards. The training results show that the average knowledge score of participants regarding item analysis before the training is 61.50, and after the training, it increases to an average score of 80. This indicates an increase in knowledge scores by 30.08%. In general, participants are now able to manually conduct item analysis effectively, but some still face difficulties in analyzing question validity, reliability, and distractor analysis.

References

Fraenkel, Jack R. dan Norman E.Wallen. 1993. How to Design and Evalute Researche in Education. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.

Jarolimek, J. 1993. Social Studies in Elementary Education. New York: Mac Millan Publishing Co Ltd.

Kurniasih, I., 2010. Mendidik SQ Anak Menurut Nabi Muhammad. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Marwa.

Mardapi, Djemari.2008. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Jogjakarta:Mitra Cendikia

Martorella, Peter H. 1994. Social Studies for Elementary Scholl, Children, Developing Young sitizens: NY. Maemillan College Publ.

Mustika, Dea., Azis, Ishak. (2021). Proses Penilaian Hasil Belajar Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal BASICEDU Volume 5 Nomor 6. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1819

Popham W. James, Eval, Baker. 2005. Teknik Mengajar Secara Sistematik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Rasyid, Harun dan Mansur. 2007. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung : CV Wacana Prima.

Schuncke. GM. 1988. Elementary Social Studies. Knowing, Doing, Caring. New York: Macmillan Publishing

Stufflebeam, L.D. & Shrinkfield, J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self– instructional guide to theory and practice. New York: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Supriyati, 2003. Onggok Terfermentasi dan Pemanfaatannya dalam Ransum Ayam Ras Pedaging. Balai Penelitian Ternak, PO BOX 221, Bogor 16002

Published

23-11-2023

How to Cite

Arpizal, A., Suratno, S., Liputo, M. A., & Refnida, R. (2023). Workshop on Item Analiysis for Teacher of State Vocational High School 6 in Jambi City . Journal of Community Engagement Research for Sustainability, 3(6), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.31258/cers.3.6.271-279

Issue

Section

Articles